|
|
|
|
|
Introduction and Analects Assignments
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 5
[No Reading]
- Administrivia.
- Some history: Zhou (Jou) Background; Timeline.
- Some methodology: Romanization; Interpretation and Reasoning; Term List.
September 10
[Reading: Original Analects, Introduction (pp 1-11), Books 4 (complete), 5 (skim), 6 (skim), 7 (complete), 9 (complete)]
- Textual methodology
- What kinds of things might be evidence that a text has come together through a process of accretion? Do you know of any texts in other traditions that are accretional?
- If we knew that a text was accretional, what differences might that make to our interpretation of it?
- Rvn. The Analects has a lot to say about both the process of becoming rvn and the state of being rvn.
- How do desires or passion fit in? Are they important, or a hindrance?
- Distinguish commitment from desire. Is one more important than the other for becoming rvn?
- What do you think the best translation of "rvn" into English is? How closely is rvn connected to a particular moment in Warring States culture and politics? In these early books of the text, do you see rvn as having any universal significance?
- What is wrong with the "small man" and his notion of "profit" or "benefit"?
- More generally, what reasons do you see the text offering for why one ought to strive for rvn?
September 12
[Reading: Books 10 (complete, including--as for all subsequent books--the interpolations assigned to this date), 11 (esp. 11:10 and *9:1), and 3 (complete). See also 12:1]
- Li (rites, ritual).
- What function or ends would the kind of behavior that is described, especially in Book 10, serve?
- To what degree do you gather Analects Confucians were committed to the details of the rituals depicted? Or might something else be the point of recording these passages?
- 3:4 talks about "the basis of ritual." What is this basis?
- Compare 9:3 (note that "customary" here translates "li," or "ritual") and 3:17-18. Is there a consistent doctrine here?
- Tradition
- In light of 2:11 and 2:23, among other passages, how do you now evaluate the role of tradition in Analects Confucianism? Have things changed since 7:1 and 7:28?
- What do 13:18 and 13:19 suggest about the general applicability of the Li?
September 17
[Reading: Books 12, 13, and 2 (all complete)]
- Authority, opposition to law and punishments, politics.
- Why did Confucians prefer leading by example to ruling via rewards and punishments?
- Why would it be a problem if "the common people will stay out of trouble but will have no sense of shame"? (See 2:3)
- How are we to understand passages that make the gentleman's power seem magical, like 2:1, 12:19, and *9:14? What is the role of the state supposed to be, according to Analects Confucians at this date?
- Mini-paper 1 assigned, due in class on September 19.
September 19
[Reading: Books 14 (complete), 15 (complete), 1 (complete), 16 (complete), 17 (pp 161-169), 18 (pp 173-176)]
- Mini-paper 1 due in class
- Self and Society
- Consider 12:2, 12:16, 14:7, *6:30. Where is the line between "self" and "other" that we (Westerners) expect to be so clear?
- Universal significance?
- Starting in LY14 we begin to see passages highly critical of a meditation/withdrawal-based movement that immediately brings the Tao Te Ching (DDJ in the Brook's abreviation) to mind. The Brooks hypothesize that the DDJ began life as a Lu text, associated with a Lu court group, and developed in parallel with LY.
- Do you notice any of these criticisms? Do they seem merely ad hominem, or are there reasons given for rejecting meditative withdrawal?
| Copyright 1999-2007
Stephen C. Angle
|
|
|